Journalist / Reporter. Rubenn Dean Paul Alws "Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro" Brazil! We opened that matter: saying is not the end!

Journalist / Reporter. Rubenn Dean Paul Alws "Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro" Brazil!

We opened that matter: saying is not the end!

... Country stopped, there is no investment, no longer public safety, no longer has health, has no more investment in education, Brazil, is a totally confusing pasando phase in all aspects. Brazil has stopped! ...

Once again Brazil to because of bad examples of some politicians and carrupção that runs rampant in the country.

'The New Yorker': Brazil after Dilma Rousseff

Report says that impeachment raises doubts about its legality even in opposition

The New Yorker magazine published an article on "Brazil after Dilma Rousseff." Since last Wednesday (31) Dilma Rousseff is no longer president of Brazil. His impeachment process has caused protests in major capitals of the country, while Michel fear now takes the presidential sash and tries to take a right turn in national politics.

According to the report most Brazilians wanted Dilma Rousseff outside, but few in the country seem to fully understand the technical grounds for his impeachment: she was sentenced for violating the budget law, decreeing lower expenses without the approval of Congress and delaying payments to banks State. In practice, the impeachment process served as a confidence vote to a president who led the country into its worst recession in decades.

Publication states that few in the country seem to fully understand the technical basis of the impeachment of Rousseff

The New Yorker

The New Yorker says the Labor Party, left, had also been implicated in a corruption scheme involving billions of dollars in political campaigns and offshore bank accounts during his thirteen years in power. The irony here is that many of the legislators who voted for Rousseff's impeachment are also suspected in the scheme.

The American newspaper talks about the defense by Dilma in the Senate this week. If describing as a tragic heroine who fought for the poor, Dilma Rousseff pragmatically threw open his own party established corrupt schemes in Brazil. It also underestimated the severity of their budgetary maneuvers, covering up a gaping deficit, while trying to re-election in 2014, in a campaign supposedly financed with money from bribes.

The New Yorker adds that even so, according to a survey, only forty-nine percent of Brazilians believe that the impeachment followed constitutional norms. This contrasts strongly with the broad consensus behind the last impeachment in 1992, when Fernando Collor de Mello was removed from office amid allegations of personal enrichment. Later, he returned to political life as a senator, and this week he voted for impeachment - a typical Dilma touch in Brazilian politics.

The New Yorker notes that the very Dilma Rousseff was not accused of personal enrichment during his tenure, and even some of his opponents have raised questions about the legal basis for their removal. Shortly after the trial, Acir Gurgacz, a senator who had just voted for Rousseff impeachment, admitted that he did not believe that their budget tricks could be considered 'impeachable offenses'. Instead, he justified his decision citing his inability to govern the country, which is not technically an offense liable to impeachment. Things were even more confused.

Senators voted separately on Wednesday for failing to prevent Dilma to dispute any public office for eight years, as the article of the Constitution on impeachment seems to demand, and as happened with Collor, concludes The New Yorker.

"Journalist / Reporter. Rubenn Dean Paul Alws" Rio de Janeiro "Brazil!

www.rubenndeanjr.blogspot.com ... twitter @ rubenndeanpaulalw ... facebook. eddie murphy rubenn dean. email. rubenndeanrj@gmail.com... cel. 21. 99337.4123 / 21. 98125.9534 / 21.98972.1658 ... what. 55 21 993374123. "